WebFox, supra; Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County v. Buck, 79 N.J. Eq. 472, 476 (Ch. 1912); Restatement, Property, § 44; 2 Powell, op. cit. § 187. To establish a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent the courts have required an express provision that upon the occurrence of that condition the grantor or his successors in ... WebTABLE OF CONTENTS xv Notes..... 124 Armory v. Delamirie..... 124 Notes..... 125
HAGAMAN v. BD. OF ED. OF TP. OF WOODBRIDGE 117 N.J.
WebOldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.22 is such a good case for exhaustive analysis of the determinable fee that surely it should be postponed to a later chapter for its relation to … Webv. STOECO HOMES Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. No. A--73. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued Jan. 22, 1958. Decided March 3, 1958. Page 249 [139 A.2d 292] W. Louis Bossle, Camden, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert K. Bell, Ocean City, for defendant-respondent Stoeco Homes, Inc. ofw 49
BABB v. RAND 345 A.2d 496 Me. Judgment Law CaseMine
WebDec 4, 2009 · However, in the absence of extrinsic evidence, the court must determine a dispute concerning title by construing the deed as a whole, without giving disproportionate emphasis to any individual part of the document. See Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., 26 N.J. 246, 255-56, 139 A.2d 291 (1958); Union County Indus. Park v. WebOldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., 26 N.J. 246, 256 (1958). Words like "revert" or "reversion" are not essential. Simes, Law of Future Interests, § 13 (2d. ed. 1966). WebOldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., supra, 26 N.J. at 258; Restatement, Property, supra, § 45, comment m, at 140; 2 Powell, Real Property, supra, § 188 at 56. But see 4 Thompson, Real Property, supra, § 1871 at 553. Where it is doubtful whether a clause in a deed is a covenant or a condition, the former is preferred. ofw-600v